| Title |
Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006936.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicola Lindson-Hawley, Tom P Thompson, Rachna Begh |
| Abstract |
Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a directive patient-centred style of counselling, designed to help people to explore and resolve ambivalence about behaviour change. It was developed as a treatment for alcohol abuse, but may help people to a make a successful attempt to quit smoking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 31 | 26% |
| Spain | 10 | 9% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 3% |
| South Africa | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Malta | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 73 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 21% |
| Scientists | 15 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 333 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 13% |
| Researcher | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 67 | 20% |
| Unknown | 71 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 16% |
| Psychology | 39 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Unknown | 83 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2020.
All research outputs
#396,928
of 24,873,243 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#697
of 12,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,657
of 261,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,873,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.