↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
128 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
Title
Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006936.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Lindson-Hawley, Tom P Thompson, Rachna Begh

Abstract

Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a directive patient-centred style of counselling, designed to help people to explore and resolve ambivalence about behaviour change. It was developed as a treatment for alcohol abuse, but may help people to a make a successful attempt to quit smoking.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 128 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Romania 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 281 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 17%
Student > Bachelor 38 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 12%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 10%
Other 57 20%
Unknown 44 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 18%
Psychology 37 13%
Social Sciences 18 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 53 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#235,548
of 17,822,916 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#479
of 11,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,571
of 222,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,822,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.