↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Optical reading aids for children and young people with low vision

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Optical reading aids for children and young people with low vision
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010987.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy Barker, Rachel Thomas, Gary Rubin, Annegret Dahlmann-Noor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 22%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Psychology 9 8%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 27 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,359,001
of 16,968,502 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,106
of 11,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,382
of 221,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#144
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,968,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.