↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Effectiveness of intermediate care in nursing-led in-patient units

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Effectiveness of intermediate care in nursing-led in-patient units
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002214.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter D Griffiths, Margaret E Edwards, Angus Forbes, Ruth G Harris, Gill Ritchie

Abstract

The Nursing led inpatient Unit (NLU) is one of a range of services that have been considered in order to manage more successfully the transition between hospital and home for patients with extended recovery times. This is an update of an earlier review published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 3, 2004.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 177 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Other 13 7%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 36 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 46 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 23%
Social Sciences 14 8%
Psychology 12 7%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 44 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,244,197
of 19,171,602 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,835
of 11,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,312
of 226,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,171,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.