↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Effectiveness of intermediate care in nursing‐led in‐patient units

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Effectiveness of intermediate care in nursing‐led in‐patient units
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002214.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter D Griffiths, Margaret E Edwards, Angus Forbes, Ruth G Harris, Gill Ritchie

Abstract

The Nursing led inpatient Unit (NLU) is one of a range of services that have been considered in order to manage more successfully the transition between hospital and home for patients with extended recovery times. This is an update of an earlier review published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 3, 2004.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 216 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Researcher 22 10%
Other 15 7%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 58 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 48 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 22%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Psychology 13 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 65 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,572,366
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,733
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,703
of 87,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.