↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Effectiveness of intermediate care in nursing-led in-patient units

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Effectiveness of intermediate care in nursing-led in-patient units
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002214.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter D Griffiths, Margaret E Edwards, Angus Forbes, Ruth G Harris, Gill Ritchie

Abstract

The Nursing led inpatient Unit (NLU) is one of a range of services that have been considered in order to manage more successfully the transition between hospital and home for patients with extended recovery times. This is an update of an earlier review published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 3, 2004.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 204 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Researcher 22 11%
Other 15 7%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 52 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 48 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 23%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Psychology 13 6%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 60 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,195,256
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,732
of 12,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,431
of 75,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.