↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Effectiveness of intermediate care in nursing-led in-patient units

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Effectiveness of intermediate care in nursing-led in-patient units
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002214.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter D Griffiths, Margaret E Edwards, Angus Forbes, Ruth G Harris, Gill Ritchie

Abstract

The Nursing led inpatient Unit (NLU) is one of a range of services that have been considered in order to manage more successfully the transition between hospital and home for patients with extended recovery times. This is an update of an earlier review published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 3, 2004.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 175 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Other 13 7%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 34 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 46 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 23%
Social Sciences 14 8%
Psychology 12 7%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 42 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,099,890
of 18,219,870 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,687
of 11,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,874
of 224,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,219,870 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.