↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Bicarbonate- versus lactate-buffered solutions for acute continuous haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Bicarbonate- versus lactate-buffered solutions for acute continuous haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006819.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Hui Tian, Bin Ma, KeHu Yang, Yali Liu, Jiying Tan, Tian Xi Liu

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a severe loss of kidney function that results in patients' inability to appropriately excrete nitrogenous wastes and creatinine. Continuous haemodiafiltration (HDF) or haemofiltration (HF) are commonly used renal replacement therapies for people with AKI. Buffered dialysates and solutions used in HDF or HF have varying effects on acid-base physiology and several electrolytes. The benefits and harms of bicarbonate- versus lactate-buffered HDF or HF solutions for treating patients with AKI remain unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 127 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 20%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 9 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 35 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Psychology 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 41 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,814,061
of 19,876,564 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,347
of 11,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,625
of 228,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,876,564 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.