The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Bicarbonate‐ versus lactate‐buffered solutions for acute continuous haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006819.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jin Hui Tian, Bin Ma, KeHu Yang, Yali Liu, Jiying Tan, Tian Xi Liu |
| Abstract |
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a severe loss of kidney function that results in patients' inability to appropriately excrete nitrogenous wastes and creatinine. Continuous haemodiafiltration (HDF) or haemofiltration (HF) are commonly used renal replacement therapies for people with AKI. Buffered dialysates and solutions used in HDF or HF have varying effects on acid-base physiology and several electrolytes. The benefits and harms of bicarbonate- versus lactate-buffered HDF or HF solutions for treating patients with AKI remain unclear. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 50% |
| India | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 18% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 48 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 55 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,523,886
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,568
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,525
of 273,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.