↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002942.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dawn Miller, Vicki Livingstone, G Peter Herbison

Abstract

The pain of mammography is recognised as a significant deterrent for women considering this examination, and may affect participation in breast screening.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 193 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 15%
Student > Master 25 13%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Other 10 5%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 52 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Psychology 8 4%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 64 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,194,875
of 25,387,480 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,632
of 12,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,880
of 168,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.