| Title |
Circulating antigen tests and urine reagent strips for diagnosis of active schistosomiasis in endemic areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009579.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleanor A Ochodo, Gowri Gopalakrishna, Bea Spek, Johannes B Reitsma, Lisette van Lieshout, Katja Polman, Poppy Lamberton, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Mariska MG Leeflang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| South Africa | 1 | 13% |
| Denmark | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 344 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 16% |
| Researcher | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 64 | 18% |
| Unknown | 88 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 48 | 14% |
| Unknown | 107 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#717,942
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,338
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,737
of 275,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.