| Title |
Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010036.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gijsbert M Overdevest, Wilco Jacobs, Carmen Vleggeert-Lankamp, Claudius Thomé, Robert Gunzburg, Wilco Peul |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 270 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 17% |
| Unknown | 88 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 7% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 107 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#5,881,484
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,661
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,588
of 259,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#163
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.