| Title |
Physical rehabilitation for critical illness myopathy and neuropathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010942.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Mehrholz, Marcus Pohl, Joachim Kugler, Jane Burridge, Simone Mückel, Bernhard Elsner |
| Abstract |
Intensive care unit (ICU) acquired or generalised weakness due to critical illness myopathy (CIM) and polyneuropathy (CIP) are major causes of chronically impaired motor function that can affect activities of daily living and quality of life. Physical rehabilitation of those affected might help to improve activities of daily living. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 278 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 12% |
| Researcher | 31 | 11% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 15% |
| Unknown | 84 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 74 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 94 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,959,369
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,078
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,687
of 272,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#177
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.