↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) for patent ductus arteriosus in preterm or low‐birth‐weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
Title
Paracetamol (acetaminophen) for patent ductus arteriosus in preterm or low‐birth‐weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010061.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arne Ohlsson, Prakeshkumar S Shah

Abstract

In preterm newborns, the ductus arteriosus frequently fails to close and the infants require medical or surgical closure of the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). A PDA can be treated surgically or medically with one of two prostaglandin inhibitors, indomethacin or ibuprofen. Case reports suggest that paracetamol may be an alternative for the closure of a PDA. Concerns have been raised that in neonatal mice paracetamol may cause adverse effects on the developing brain, and an association between prenatal exposure to paracetamol and later development of autism or autism spectrum disorder has been reported.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 190 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 15%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Postgraduate 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 40 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 11%
Psychology 15 8%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 48 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,433,183
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,988
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,384
of 275,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#157
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.