↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacological interventions for pain in children and adolescents with life-limiting conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
103 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
343 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacological interventions for pain in children and adolescents with life-limiting conditions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010750.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Beecham, Bridget Candy, Richard Howard, Renée McCulloch, Jo Laddie, Henrietta Rees, Victoria Vickerstaff, Myra Bluebond-Langner, Louise Jones

Abstract

Pain is one of the most common symptoms in children and young people (CYP) with life-limiting conditions (LLCs) which include a wide range of diagnoses including cancer. The current literature indicates that pain is not well managed, however the evidence base to guide clinicians is limited. There is a clear need for evidence from a systematic review to inform prescribing.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 338 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 19%
Researcher 43 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 8%
Other 75 22%
Unknown 66 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 13%
Psychology 19 6%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 94 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2021.
All research outputs
#351,064
of 17,641,103 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#761
of 11,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,600
of 223,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,641,103 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.