↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for reducing medication errors in children in hospital

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
47 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for reducing medication errors in children in hospital
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006208.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jolanda M Maaskant, Hester Vermeulen, Bugewa Apampa, Bernard Fernando, Maisoon A Ghaleb, Antje Neubert, Sudhin Thayyil, Aung Soe

Abstract

Many hospitalised patients are affected by medication errors (MEs) that may cause discomfort, harm and even death. Children are at especially high risk of harm as the result of MEs because such errors are potentially more hazardous to them than to adults. Until now, interventions to reduce MEs have led to only limited improvements.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 368 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 17%
Student > Bachelor 48 13%
Researcher 39 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 5%
Other 55 15%
Unknown 107 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 77 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 73 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 7%
Psychology 22 6%
Computer Science 14 4%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 119 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2018.
All research outputs
#996,146
of 20,420,776 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,396
of 12,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,015
of 276,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,420,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.