| Title |
Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006545.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Monica Novoa, Eulalia Baselga, Sandra Beltran, Lucia Giraldo, Ali Shahbaz, Hector Pardo‐Hernandez, Ingrid Arevalo‐Rodriguez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 17% |
| Colombia | 5 | 11% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 9% |
| Mexico | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 21% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 389 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 12% |
| Researcher | 43 | 11% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 16% |
| Unknown | 142 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 113 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 9% |
| Psychology | 20 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 10% |
| Unknown | 163 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,276,726
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,700
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,524
of 341,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.