↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Workplace interventions for neck pain in workers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
392 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Workplace interventions for neck pain in workers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008160.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Randi Wågø Aas, Hanne Tuntland, Kari Anne Holte, Cecilie Røe, Thomas Lund, Staffan Marklund, Anders Moller

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common cause of disability in many industrial countries. Recurrent and chronic pain accounts for a substantial portion of workers' absenteeism. Neck pain seems to be more prominent in the general population than previously known.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 380 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 19%
Student > Bachelor 49 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 11%
Student > Postgraduate 31 8%
Researcher 29 7%
Other 88 22%
Unknown 75 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 117 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 13%
Social Sciences 29 7%
Psychology 24 6%
Computer Science 11 3%
Other 64 16%
Unknown 98 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#974,056
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,139
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,801
of 109,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.