↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010217.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana Kang, Julia Han, Molly M Neuberger, M. Louis Moy, Sheila A Wallace, Pablo Alonso‐Coello, Philipp Dahm

Abstract

Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation is a relatively novel, minimally invasive device-based intervention used to treat individuals with urinary incontinence (UI). No systematic review of the evidence supporting its use has been published to date.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Unknown 202 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Other 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Researcher 13 6%
Other 47 23%
Unknown 58 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 15%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Unspecified 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 71 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,474
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,336
of 291,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#219
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.