↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological therapies (remotely delivered) for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
65 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
498 Mendeley
Title
Psychological therapies (remotely delivered) for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011118.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Fisher, Emily Law, Tonya M Palermo, Christopher Eccleston

Abstract

Chronic pain is common during childhood and adolescence and is associated with negative outcomes such as increased severity of pain, reduced function (e.g. missing school), and low mood (e.g. high levels of depression and anxiety). Psychological therapies, traditionally delivered face-to-face with a therapist, are efficacious at reducing pain intensity and disability. However, new and innovative technology is being used to deliver these psychological therapies remotely, meaning barriers to access to treatment such as distance and cost can be removed or reduced. Therapies delivered with technological devices, such as the Internet, computer-based programmes, smartphone applications, or via the telephone, can be used to deliver treatment to children and adolescents with chronic pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 498 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 489 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 14%
Researcher 58 12%
Student > Bachelor 50 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 7%
Other 74 15%
Unknown 109 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 117 23%
Psychology 108 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 12%
Social Sciences 23 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 48 10%
Unknown 134 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,001,132
of 26,018,952 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,890
of 13,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,217
of 279,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,018,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.