| Title |
Psychological therapies (remotely delivered) for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011118.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma Fisher, Emily Law, Tonya M Palermo, Christopher Eccleston |
| Abstract |
Chronic pain is common during childhood and adolescence and is associated with negative outcomes such as increased severity of pain, reduced function (e.g. missing school), and low mood (e.g. high levels of depression and anxiety). Psychological therapies, traditionally delivered face-to-face with a therapist, are efficacious at reducing pain intensity and disability. However, new and innovative technology is being used to deliver these psychological therapies remotely, meaning barriers to access to treatment such as distance and cost can be removed or reduced. Therapies delivered with technological devices, such as the Internet, computer-based programmes, smartphone applications, or via the telephone, can be used to deliver treatment to children and adolescents with chronic pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 21% |
| Canada | 12 | 18% |
| United States | 11 | 16% |
| Australia | 6 | 9% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 60% |
| Scientists | 16 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 468 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 96 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 15% |
| Researcher | 57 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 37 | 8% |
| Other | 73 | 15% |
| Unknown | 96 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 115 | 24% |
| Psychology | 106 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 45 | 9% |
| Unknown | 121 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#899,039
of 24,564,172 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,824
of 12,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,463
of 268,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,564,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.