| Title |
Enteral nutrition formulations for acute pancreatitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010605.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Goran Poropat, Vanja Giljaca, Goran Hauser, Davor Štimac |
| Abstract |
Acute pancreatitis is a common and potentially lethal disease with increasing incidence. Severe cases are characterised by high mortality, and despite improvements in intensive care management, no specific treatment relevantly improves clinical outcomes of the disease. Meta-analyses suggest that enteral nutrition is more effective than conventional treatment consisting of discontinuation of oral intake with use of total parenteral nutrition. However, no systematic review has compared different enteral nutrition formulations for the treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 38% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 292 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 11% |
| Researcher | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 18% |
| Unknown | 99 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Unknown | 108 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,965,037
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,186
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,898
of 278,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.