↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Enteral nutrition formulations for acute pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
Title
Enteral nutrition formulations for acute pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010605.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Goran Poropat, Vanja Giljaca, Goran Hauser, Davor Štimac

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis is a common and potentially lethal disease with increasing incidence. Severe cases are characterised by high mortality, and despite improvements in intensive care management, no specific treatment relevantly improves clinical outcomes of the disease. Meta-analyses suggest that enteral nutrition is more effective than conventional treatment consisting of discontinuation of oral intake with use of total parenteral nutrition. However, no systematic review has compared different enteral nutrition formulations for the treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 256 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 11%
Researcher 21 8%
Other 15 6%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 73 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 83 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,675,171
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,804
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,382
of 263,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.