↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Gastro‐oesophageal reflux treatment for prolonged non‐specific cough in children and adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Gastro‐oesophageal reflux treatment for prolonged non‐specific cough in children and adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004823.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne B Chang, Toby J Lasserson, Justin Gaffney, Frances L Connor, Luke A Garske

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is said to be the causative factor in up to 41% of adults with chronic cough. Treatment for GORD includes conservative measures (diet manipulation), pharmaceutical therapy (motility or prokinetic agents, H(2)-antagonist and proton pump inhibitors (PPI)) and fundoplication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Unknown 166 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 13 8%
Other 42 25%
Unknown 47 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Psychology 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 57 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,331,539
of 25,383,278 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,096
of 12,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,759
of 193,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.