↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) for tinnitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) for tinnitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007330.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

John S Phillips, Don McFerran

Abstract

Tinnitus is described as the perception of sound or noise in the absence of real acoustic stimulation. Although an outright cure for tinnitus remains elusive, various management strategies have been developed to help to lessen the impact of the symptom. Following the publication of a neurophysiological model of tinnitus, Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) was developed. Using a combination of directive counselling and sound therapy in a strict framework, this is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for tinnitus. Many studies refer to the use of TRT where in fact a modified version of this therapy is actually being implemented. It is therefore important to confirm the use of authentic TRT when reviewing any study that reports its use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 223 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 30%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Postgraduate 19 8%
Researcher 14 6%
Other 13 6%
Other 44 20%
Unknown 43 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 8%
Psychology 10 4%
Engineering 10 4%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 51 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,284,188
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,836
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,776
of 110,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.