↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for the cessation of non‐nutritive sucking habits in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
57 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
545 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for the cessation of non‐nutritive sucking habits in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008694.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felicity RP Borrie, David R Bearn, Nicola PT Innes, Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 545 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 544 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 14%
Student > Bachelor 56 10%
Student > Postgraduate 48 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 7%
Researcher 35 6%
Other 89 16%
Unknown 206 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 201 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 6%
Psychology 29 5%
Social Sciences 17 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 1%
Other 37 7%
Unknown 225 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#867,808
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,571
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,389
of 280,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.