| Title |
Contracts between patients and healthcare practitioners for improving patients' adherence to treatment, prevention and health promotion activities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004808.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xavier Bosch-Capblanch, Katharine Abba, Megan Prictor, Paul Garner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 463 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 441 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 75 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 12% |
| Researcher | 50 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 79 | 17% |
| Unknown | 117 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 143 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 58 | 13% |
| Psychology | 37 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 47 | 10% |
| Unknown | 138 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,269,153
of 24,752,377 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,580
of 12,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,260
of 82,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,752,377 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.