↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise training for adults with chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
421 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
861 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Exercise training for adults with chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003236.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne Heiwe, Stefan H Jacobson

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide public health problem. In the National Kidney Foundation Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines it is stressed that lifestyle issues such as physical activity should be seen as cornerstones of the therapy. The physical fitness in adults with CKD is so reduced that it impinges on ability and capacity to perform activities in everyday life and occupational tasks. An increasing number of studies have been published regarding health effects of various regular exercise programmes in adults with CKD and in renal transplant patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 861 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 838 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 138 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 108 13%
Student > Bachelor 95 11%
Researcher 76 9%
Student > Postgraduate 56 7%
Other 174 20%
Unknown 214 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 283 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 111 13%
Sports and Recreations 63 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 4%
Psychology 31 4%
Other 103 12%
Unknown 237 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,643,523
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,540
of 13,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,632
of 144,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.