The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Clinical symptoms, signs and tests for identification of impending and current water‐loss dehydration in older people
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009647.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lee Hooper, Asmaa Abdelhamid, Natalie J Attreed, Wayne W Campbell, Adam M Channell, Philippe Chassagne, Kennith R Culp, Stephen J Fletcher, Matthew B Fortes, Nigel Fuller, Phyllis M Gaspar, Daniel J Gilbert, Adam C Heathcote, Mohannad W Kafri, Fumiko Kajii, Gregor Lindner, Gary W Mack, Janet C Mentes, Paolo Merlani, Rowan A Needham, Marcel GM Olde Rikkert, Andreas Perren, James Powers, Sheila C Ranson, Patrick Ritz, Anne M Rowat, Fredrik Sjöstrand, Alexandra C Smith, Jodi JD Stookey, Nancy A Stotts, David R Thomas, Angela Vivanti, Bonnie J Wakefield, Nana Waldréus, Neil P Walsh, Sean Ward, John F Potter, Paul Hunter |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Australia | 3 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Sweden | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 29 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 650 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 646 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 101 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 81 | 12% |
| Researcher | 62 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 5% |
| Other | 104 | 16% |
| Unknown | 209 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 175 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 104 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 2% |
| Psychology | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 88 | 14% |
| Unknown | 235 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#830,538
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,476
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,527
of 279,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.