↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Home-based educational interventions for children with asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
Title
Home-based educational interventions for children with asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008469.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma J Welsh, Maryam Hasan, Patricia Li

Abstract

While guidelines recommend that children with asthma should receive asthma education, it is not known if education delivered in the home is superior to usual care or the same education delivered elsewhere. The home setting allows educators to reach populations (such as the economically disadvantaged) that may experience barriers to care (such as lack of transportation) within a familiar environment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 282 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 13%
Researcher 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 55 19%
Unknown 53 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 12%
Social Sciences 24 8%
Psychology 21 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 27 9%
Unknown 61 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,018,593
of 15,968,783 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,728
of 11,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,723
of 105,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,968,783 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.