| Title |
Transmyocardial laser revascularization versus medical therapy for refractory angina
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003712.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eduardo Briones, Juan Ramon Lacalle, Ignacio Marin-Leon, José-Ramón Rueda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 183 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 57 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 11% |
| Psychology | 12 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 60 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,409,030
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,429
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,666
of 255,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#243
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.