↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oral immunoglobulin for the treatment of rotavirus diarrhea in low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Oral immunoglobulin for the treatment of rotavirus diarrhea in low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003742.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohan Pammi, Khalid N Haque

Abstract

Rotavirus infection is the most common neonatal nosocomial viral infection. It is a major health problem worldwide. Epidemics with the newer P(6)G9 strains have been reported in neonatal units globally. These strains can cause severe symptoms in most infected infants. Infection control measures become necessary and the utilization of hospital resources increase. Local mucosal immunity in the intestine to rotavirus is important in the resolution of infection and protection against subsequent infections. Boosting local immunity by oral administration of anti-rotaviral immunoglobulin preparations might be a useful strategy in treating rotaviral infections, especially in low birth weight babies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Master 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 9 8%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 29 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Unspecified 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 34 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,235
of 25,383,225 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,478
of 12,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,277
of 140,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#110
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.