↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for disorders of eye movement in patients with stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
335 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for disorders of eye movement in patients with stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008389.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Pollock, Christine Hazelton, Clair A Henderson, Jayne Angilley, Baljean Dhillon, Peter Langhorne, Katrina Livingstone, Frank A Munro, Heather Orr, Fiona J Rowe, Uma Shahani

Abstract

Eye movement disorders may affect over 70% of stroke patients. These eye movement disorders can result in difficulty maintaining the normal ocular position and difficulty moving the eyes appropriately. The resulting functional disabilities include a loss of depth perception, reduced hand-to-eye co-ordination, marked difficulties with near tasks and reading and reduced ability to scan the visual environment. They can also impact on the effectiveness of rehabilitation therapy. There are a wide variety of different treatment interventions proposed for eye movement disorders after stroke. However, in the past, there has been a lack of evidence specific to the impact of interventions on the functional outcome of patients with stroke.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 328 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 19%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 12%
Researcher 37 11%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 60 18%
Unknown 76 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 12%
Psychology 34 10%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Neuroscience 13 4%
Other 46 14%
Unknown 85 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2018.
All research outputs
#5,150,433
of 25,383,278 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,418
of 12,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,535
of 140,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.