| Title |
Outreach and Early Warning Systems (EWS) for the prevention of Intensive Care admission and death of critically ill adult patients on general hospital wards
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005529.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer McGaughey, Fiona Alderdice, Robert Fowler, Atul Kapila, Alain Mayhew, Marianne Moutray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 296 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 16% |
| Researcher | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 11% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 63 | 21% |
| Unknown | 68 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 135 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 81 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,964,956
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,529
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,779
of 78,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.