↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Outreach and Early Warning Systems (EWS) for the prevention of Intensive Care admission and death of critically ill adult patients on general hospital wards

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
315 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Outreach and Early Warning Systems (EWS) for the prevention of Intensive Care admission and death of critically ill adult patients on general hospital wards
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005529.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer McGaughey, Fiona Alderdice, Robert Fowler, Atul Kapila, Alain Mayhew, Marianne Moutray

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 287 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 16%
Researcher 34 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 11%
Other 30 10%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Other 62 21%
Unknown 61 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 133 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 13%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 74 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,875,065
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,015
of 11,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,624
of 77,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.