↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Outreach and Early Warning Systems (EWS) for the prevention of Intensive Care admission and death of critically ill adult patients on general hospital wards

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
283 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Outreach and Early Warning Systems (EWS) for the prevention of Intensive Care admission and death of critically ill adult patients on general hospital wards
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005529.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer McGaughey, Fiona Alderdice, Robert Fowler, Atul Kapila, Alain Mayhew, Marianne Moutray

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 266 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 12%
Researcher 32 12%
Other 29 10%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Other 59 21%
Unknown 47 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 133 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 13%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 60 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#4,550,384
of 17,356,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,920
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,632
of 238,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#170
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,356,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.