↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Caffeine versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Caffeine versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000273.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J Henderson-Smart, Peter A Steer

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 153 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 15%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Other 19 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 7%
Psychology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 40 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,366,860
of 20,807,010 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,930
of 12,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,997
of 246,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#140
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,807,010 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.