↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vitamin A for non‐measles pneumonia in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin A for non‐measles pneumonia in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003700.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taixiang Wu, Juan Ni, Jiafu Wei

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 163 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 51 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 62 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,440,078
of 26,314,972 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,041
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,782
of 70,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,972 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.