↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vitamin A for non-measles pneumonia in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin A for non-measles pneumonia in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003700.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taixiang Wu, Juan Ni, Jiafu Wei

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 6 5%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 34 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,160,404
of 17,356,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,879
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,510
of 240,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#124
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,356,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.