↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intra‐aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
363 Mendeley
Title
Intra‐aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007398.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne Unverzagt, Michael Buerke, Antoinette de Waha, Johannes Haerting, Diana Pietzner, Melchior Seyfarth, Holger Thiele, Karl Werdan, Uwe Zeymer, Roland Prondzinsky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 361 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 15%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Other 31 9%
Researcher 29 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 8%
Other 77 21%
Unknown 104 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 152 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 9%
Unspecified 11 3%
Psychology 9 2%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 108 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,722,734
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,393
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,725
of 281,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#146
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.