↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Evening versus morning dosing regimen drug therapy for hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
44 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Evening versus morning dosing regimen drug therapy for hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004184.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ping Zhao, Ping Xu, Chaomin Wan, Zhengrong Wang

Abstract

Variation in blood pressure levels display circadian rhythms. The morning surge in blood pressure is known to increase the risk of myocardial events in the first several hours post awakening. A systematic review of the administration-time-related-effects of evening versus morning dosing regimen of antihypertensive drugs in the management of patients with primary hypertension has not been conducted.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 139 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 16%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Other 13 9%
Other 37 26%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 28 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#523,762
of 18,907,259 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,161
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,263
of 114,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,907,259 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.