↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Electropalatography for articulation disorders associated with cleft palate

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Electropalatography for articulation disorders associated with cleft palate
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006854.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice S-Y Lee, James Law, Fiona E. Gibbon

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 130 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 20%
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 14%
Psychology 15 11%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Linguistics 5 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 31 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2013.
All research outputs
#5,602,578
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,107
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,073
of 241,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#196
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.