↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Electropalatography for articulation disorders associated with cleft palate

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Electropalatography for articulation disorders associated with cleft palate
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006854.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice S-Y Lee, James Law, Fiona E. Gibbon

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 161 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 42 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Psychology 15 9%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Linguistics 6 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 51 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,459,696
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,944
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,095
of 109,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.