↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

EMG biofeedback for the recovery of motor function after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
Title
EMG biofeedback for the recovery of motor function after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004585.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henry J Woodford, Christopher IM Price

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 253 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 16%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Postgraduate 14 5%
Other 56 21%
Unknown 37 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 21%
Engineering 40 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 12%
Neuroscience 29 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 8%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 51 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2020.
All research outputs
#15,300,440
of 19,102,798 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,986
of 11,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,927
of 244,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#235
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,102,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.