↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Adjuvant chemotherapy for endometrial cancer after hysterectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Adjuvant chemotherapy for endometrial cancer after hysterectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003175.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nick Johnson, Andrew Bryant, Tracie Miles, Thomas Hogberg, Paul Cornes

Abstract

Endometrial adenocarcinoma (womb cancer) is a malignant growth of the lining (endometrium) of the womb (uterus). It is distinct from sarcomas (tumours of the uterine muscle). Survival depends the risk of microscopic metastases after surgery. Adjuvant (postoperative) chemotherapy improves survival from some other adenocarcinomas, and there is evidence that endometrial cancer is sensitive to cytotoxic therapy. This systematic review examines the effect of chemotherapy on survival after hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 21%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 33 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,706,330
of 14,510,340 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,431
of 10,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,477
of 100,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,510,340 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.