The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Cognitive‐behavioural treatment for subacute and chronic neck pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010664.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco Monticone, Christine Cedraschi, Emilia Ambrosini, Barbara Rocca, Roberta Fiorentini, Maddalena Restelli, Silvia Gianola, Simona Ferrante, Gustavo A Zanoli, Lorenzo Moja |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 15% |
| Australia | 5 | 11% |
| Canada | 4 | 9% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 15% |
| Scientists | 7 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 473 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 472 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 99 | 21% |
| Researcher | 46 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 72 | 15% |
| Unknown | 139 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 115 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 83 | 18% |
| Psychology | 45 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 49 | 10% |
| Unknown | 158 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,082,566
of 26,738,782 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,009
of 13,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,265
of 281,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,738,782 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.