↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-pharmacological interventions for caregivers of stroke survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Non-pharmacological interventions for caregivers of stroke survivors
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008179.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynn A Legg, Terry J Quinn, Fahd Mahmood, Christopher J Weir, Jayne Tierney, David J Stott, Lorraine N Smith, Peter Langhorne

Abstract

A substantial component of care is provided to stroke survivors by informal caregivers. However, providing such care is often a new and challenging experience and has been linked to a number of adverse outcomes. A range of interventions targeted towards stroke survivors and their family or other informal caregivers have been tested in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). 

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 201 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 55 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 19%
Psychology 25 12%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 65 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#4,506,504
of 22,037,553 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,924
of 12,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,707
of 120,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,037,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.