↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
534 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
716 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005470.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Baker, Janette Camosso‐Stefinovic, Clare Gillies, Elizabeth J Shaw, Francine Cheater, Signe Flottorp, Noelle Robertson, Michel Wensing, Michelle Fiander, Martin P Eccles, Maciek Godycki‐Cwirko, Jan van Lieshout, Cornelia Jäger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 716 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 707 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 111 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 13%
Researcher 89 12%
Student > Bachelor 53 7%
Student > Postgraduate 45 6%
Other 134 19%
Unknown 189 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 197 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 111 16%
Psychology 58 8%
Social Sciences 36 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 2%
Other 71 10%
Unknown 227 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,168,578
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,741
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,751
of 279,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#121
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.