↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003493
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Luis Rodriguez‐Martin, José Manuel Barbanoj, TE Schlaepfer, Susana SC Clos, V Pérez, J Kulisevsky, A Gironell

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation can either excite or inhibit cortical areas of the brain, depending on whether the speed of the repetitive stimulation is applied at high or low frequencies. It has been used for physiological studies and it has also been proposed as a treatment for depression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
Canada 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 196 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 18%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 46 22%
Unknown 46 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 31%
Psychology 31 15%
Neuroscience 17 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 63 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,720,388
of 26,473,472 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,484
of 13,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,861
of 128,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,473,472 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.