↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Steroid therapy for meconium aspiration syndrome in newborn infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Steroid therapy for meconium aspiration syndrome in newborn infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003485
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meredith C Ward, John KH Sinn

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 92 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 24 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,762,871
of 20,807,010 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,651
of 12,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,256
of 249,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#197
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,807,010 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.