↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to improve question formulation in professional practice and self-directed learning

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions to improve question formulation in professional practice and self-directed learning
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007335.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanya Horsley, Jennifer O'Neill, Jessie McGowan, Laure Perrier, Gabrielle Kane, Craig Campbell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 124 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 9 7%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 38 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Psychology 6 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 44 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,041,349
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,639
of 12,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,572
of 95,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.