↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Joint lavage for osteoarthritis of the knee

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Joint lavage for osteoarthritis of the knee
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007320.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephan Reichenbach, Anne WS Rutjes, Eveline Nüesch, Sven Trelle, Peter Jüni

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 154 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Other 15 9%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 32 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 38 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#857,914
of 18,090,383 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,162
of 11,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,836
of 243,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,090,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.