↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Taxane‐containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
Title
Taxane‐containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003366.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Davina Ghersi, Melina L Willson, Matthew Ming Ki Chan, John Simes, Emma Donoghue, Nicholas Wilcken

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 251 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Researcher 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 93 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 6%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 92 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,176,806
of 26,544,284 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,383
of 13,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,706
of 280,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,544,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.