| Title |
Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003934.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lawrence, Annemarie, Lewis, Lucy, Hofmeyr, G Justus, Dowswell, Therese, Styles, Cathy |
| Abstract |
It is more common for women in the developed world, and those in low-income countries giving birth in health facilities, to labour in bed. There is no evidence that this is associated with any advantage for women or babies, although it may be more convenient for staff. Observational studies have suggested that if women lie on their backs during labour this may have adverse effects on uterine contractions and impede progress in labour. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 45 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,476,200
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,395
of 12,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,217
of 95,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.