The effectiveness of strategies to change organisational culture to improve healthcare performance
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Elena Parmelli, Gerd Flodgren, Mary Ellen Schaafsma, Nick Baillie, Fiona R Beyer, Martin P Eccles
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||30||20%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||15||10%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||12||8%|
|Student > Postgraduate||10||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||40||26%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||21||14%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||15||10%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2015.
All research outputs
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 182,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.