↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mobile phone‐based interventions for improving contraception use

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
507 Mendeley
Title
Mobile phone‐based interventions for improving contraception use
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011159.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Smith, Judy Gold, Thoai D Ngo, Colin Sumpter, Caroline Free

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 507 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 500 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 104 21%
Researcher 67 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 8%
Student > Postgraduate 25 5%
Other 66 13%
Unknown 143 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 12%
Social Sciences 40 8%
Psychology 33 7%
Computer Science 16 3%
Other 75 15%
Unknown 159 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,868,759
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,966
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,557
of 278,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.