↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Blue‐light filtering intraocular lenses (IOLs) for protecting macular health

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
139 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
Title
Blue‐light filtering intraocular lenses (IOLs) for protecting macular health
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011977.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura E Downie, Ljoudmila Busija, Peter R Keller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 272 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Student > Master 27 10%
Other 20 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 7%
Researcher 19 7%
Other 55 20%
Unknown 98 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 8%
Neuroscience 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 110 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 209. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#194,864
of 26,117,612 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#323
of 13,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,188
of 346,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,117,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.