The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Blue‐light filtering intraocular lenses (IOLs) for protecting macular health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011977.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura E Downie, Ljoudmila Busija, Peter R Keller |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 8 | 6% |
| Spain | 6 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 111 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 129 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 5% |
| Scientists | 2 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 277 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Researcher | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 21% |
| Unknown | 99 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 13% |
| Unknown | 111 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 208. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#198,471
of 26,362,847 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#328
of 13,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,216
of 347,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,362,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.