↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Progressive resistance strength training for improving physical function in older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
884 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1110 Mendeley
Title
Progressive resistance strength training for improving physical function in older adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002759.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chiung-ju Liu, Nancy K Latham

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 1078 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 213 19%
Student > Bachelor 189 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 124 11%
Researcher 99 9%
Student > Postgraduate 60 5%
Other 191 17%
Unknown 234 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 275 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 181 16%
Sports and Recreations 147 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 4%
Social Sciences 36 3%
Other 126 11%
Unknown 297 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#574,157
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,108
of 12,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,378
of 111,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.