↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled versus oral steroids for adults with chronic asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled versus oral steroids for adults with chronic asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002160
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bob RJ Mash, Angeni Bheekie, Paul Jones

Abstract

To determine therapeutically equivalent doses of inhaled versus oral steroids for adults with chronic asthma. The Cochrane Airways Group trials register was searched using the terms: (drug delivery systems OR ((nebuli* OR inhal* OR MDI) AND oral*)) AND ( steroid* OR corticosteroid* OR glucocorticoid* OR beclomethasone OR betamethasone OR fluticasone OR cortisone OR dexamethasone OR hydrocortisone OR prednisolone OR prednisone OR triamcinolone). Randomised controlled trials were selected of at least 4 weeks duration and included patients over the age of 15 years with chronic asthma. Trials compared inhaled steroids and oral prednisolone or prednisone; where the maximum dose for inhaled steroids was 2000 mcg/day and prednisolone 60 mg (on alternate days). Two independent reviewers screened 1285 titles and abstracts from the electronic search, bibliography searches and other contacts. Of these, 10 trials met previously defined inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics, and outcome measures. All trials were small and no data could be pooled. Carry-over effects were present in at least one cross-over trial. Data from six trials produced the same pattern, in which prednisolone 7.5-12 mg/day appeared to be as effective as inhaled steroid 300-2000 mcg/day. In two trials, inhaled steroid 300-400 mcg/day was more effective than prednisolone 5 mg/day. All doses of inhaled steroid appeared to be more effective than alternate day doses of prednisolone up to 60 mg on alternate days. Side-effect data were reported too variably to permit comparisons. A 30% incidence was reported in one study in patients receiving prednisolone 5 mg/day, none were reported in patients on inhaled steroids. A further search was conducted in October 2000 which yielded no further trials. A daily dose of prednisolone 7.5-10 mg/day appears to be equivalent to moderate-high dose inhaled corticosteroids. Side-effects may be present on low doses, so if there is no alternative to oral steroids, the lowest effective dose should be prescribed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Librarian 5 4%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 52 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Engineering 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 56 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,768,617
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,151
of 12,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,611
of 114,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.