The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Oral contraceptives for pain associated with endometriosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001019.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Brown, Tineke J Crawford, Shree Datta, Andrew Prentice |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 459 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 459 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 11% |
| Researcher | 41 | 9% |
| Other | 32 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 7% |
| Other | 76 | 17% |
| Unknown | 172 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 137 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 3% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 53 | 12% |
| Unknown | 191 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#657,323
of 26,161,782 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,138
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,070
of 346,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,161,782 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.