The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007058.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa Whitworth, Leanne Bricker, Clare Mullan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 680 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 670 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 95 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 13% |
| Researcher | 58 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 44 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 6% |
| Other | 120 | 18% |
| Unknown | 233 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 198 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 69 | 10% |
| Psychology | 22 | 3% |
| Engineering | 20 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 91 | 13% |
| Unknown | 262 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2024.
All research outputs
#669,654
of 26,213,600 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,166
of 13,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,290
of 276,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,213,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.